Clinical data management (re-)actions to questions

 

As the data crossroad centre, questions about clinical data can enter from all sides. From the Project Manager and clinical study sites to the Statistician and Medical Writer. How to streamline your team’s communication and action up on these questions? Up on inconsistencies or unclarities came across?
How to grow and benefit from the questions asked?

By sharing the question and your (re-)action taken.

But then, how could you share your lessons with your colleagues?
By visualizing your team’s approach on one A4 page.

1. As a team, start your trip through the following flowchart.
 

2. Adjust the steps taken to your own situation and principles.

3. Adjust the words to your team’s familiar phrases.

4. Adjust the colours to your company colours.

5. Start to follow the steps in daily practice.

6. And fine-tune the steps where you and your team can.

Any problem, inconsistency or unclarity about clinical data, in other words any clinical data management related question asked, is an opportunity for learning and growing.
Two requirements for gaining from any questions are that you:

  1. need to listen to the sender. Taking time for the sender to hand over his/her message.
  2. And secondly, to stop near the end of the road and pick up the lesson or skill learned along the way.

And please take your colleagues with you. In the passenger’s seat or in the backseats.

For you to grow yourself,

A. Write down all the questions asked during working hours since last month.

B. Divide these questions in clinical data management related categories. 1=Definitely, 2=Possibly, 3=Definitely not.

C. Which category has the highest number of questions?

D. Could you and your team think of a way to decrease the number in this category  in the future?

Good luck (re-)acting up on the questions you get,

Fine regards,

Maritza

© 2012 ProCDM

Please add the following text if you like to re-publish this newsletter: “This is an article of ProCDM. Helping people with the organization of clinical databases. Receive tips and the free e-book ‘Five strategies to get reliable, quality clinical data’ by subscribing via http://www.procdm.nl/pages/knowledgebase.asp.”

share on Twitter

 

Decide clinical data based

 
Clinical databases help people to make decisions. Go no go decisions, decisions to adjust the product or to narrow the indication. The clinical database itself doesn’t decide, but the verified, complete data in it can help you to decide.

 

How does the clinical database helps to decide?

1. Through the structured way of data collection. Pre-defined CRF data collected for each participating individual at comparable time intervals.

2. By verifying that the data collected is as expected. And in case it isn’t, that reasons are present to clarify the unexpected.

3. By verifying data collected for completeness. Complete for all people participating in the study.

4. By structuring the individual participant stories (CRFs) to electronic files per measurement (datasets). E.g. all recorded adverse events from all patients in the adverse event file. Or all medication administration data for all participants in the medical dosing data file.

5. By listing all data in raw data listings. With which clinical research colleagues can track people withdrawn from the study or review measurements out of normal ranges and their consequences for people’s health.

6. By handing over the final, clean data files to Statistics people for further analysis.

7. Through the status reports that alert you of expected data not yet received. Provide enrolment rates. Show any queries not resolved yet. Indicate which data is deemed clean. Everything to help you to get a complete and clean clinical database with which true decisions can be made.

A clinical database contributes to decisions about the product under investigation in the clinical trial. Thus you need to take good decisions for the clinical database to be filled too. Overall decisions about software and hardware. About system validation and your data management organization. Decisions per individual clinical database about data collection, data verification, and database organization. And whilst performing data verification, decisions about the things noticed and your action to take. Decisions about sending queries and formulating query texts. About your action up on a received query reaction. Decisions up on questions from your client and your (re-)action up on these.

For you,

A. What kind of decisions do you encounter? Those that show directly after reading this question.

B. How do you handle those decisions? With regards to comfort, time and people involved.

C. Could you delegate, automate or capture any decision in a process flowchart?

Good luck with your clinical database decisions,

Fine regards,

Maritza

© 2012, Maritza Witteveen, ProCDM  

 share on Twitter

Data verification puzzles

Important part of the data management job is to verify received data. Checking for inconsistencies and unexpected patterns. Verifying that the data is complete, legible, logical and plausible.

However, how to perform data verification?

You could regard the data verification job as completing a couple of puzzles. Each puzzle is one subject participating in the clinical trial or clinical study at stake. As such, the puzzles resemble each other a great deal. But they are not exact copies. Each subject, each puzzle, is (slightly) different, unique.

Pleasant and thoughtful team action:

Do you have a puzzle somewhere in a cupboard? More than one from the same series? At least 2 puzzles with > 100 pieces each? Open the boxes, drop their content in one pile on the table and start completing the puzzles/subjects. The more pieces in place of a puzzle, the more evident which pieces to expect.

1. Get the parts received, divide them per subject/puzzle and start making all the puzzles. The clinical information up on each subject is coming in pieces, per completed visit data, per available adverse event information. In the beginning you’ll thus work with lots of incomplete puzzles.

2. Any holes in any puzzle/subject, any missing parts, you need to look for/query. Note that holes are allowed if your puzzle/story is as such! However, leave no unexpected holes. Meaning that if an assessment took place, you want to have the corresponding result(s) completed.

3. Any duplicate pieces, get rid of them. Please query.

4. Any pieces not fitting your puzzle/subject story, you need to check up on. Maybe they belong to another puzzle/subject. Or they are incomplete and can therefore not fit (yet). They could even be wrong delivered and not belong to the study at all.

5. Any pieces fitting but rotated 90 or 180 degrees, please turn/query. Get the puzzle showing a logical story.

6. Any pieces damaged, please try to fix the damaged parts. E.g. spilled coffee over a paper CRF. Illegible text parts. Or unclear texts that can be interpreted differently.

7. Any pieces added at the wrong place, query and bring to their right position. E.g. an error in an assessment date.

In trial/study language, the more data for a subject received and in the database, the easier to get the subject’s story complete. However, the more care needed to get the true story. The logical, plausible subject story. Attention to medication given for an adverse event but missing in the concomitant medication list. Or laboratory shifts to worse results but missing corresponding adverse events listed.

Completing the holes in a puzzle is easy, for data management the edit checks help you tremendously with that. Getting a logical, plausible story for each patient, reflecting the truth, is the real data management challenge. Which takes more than just structuring pieces. It asks you to look and understand the pictures up on the pieces received.

Good luck with your data management puzzles,

Good regards,

Maritza

© 2012, Maritza Witteveen, ProCDM

Please add the following text if you like to re-publish this newsletter: “This is an article of ProCDM. Clinical data management training. Receive tips and the free e-book ‘Five strategies to get reliable, quality clinical data’ by subscribing via http://www.procdm.nl/pages/knowledgebase.asp.”

 share on Twitter

Black box testing for clinical data management

 

Dear Reader,

This article is about black box testing which I use a lot within clinical data management. It helps me to judge if system, people and procedures are able to assure quality clinical study data.
Therefore I do not exactly need to know how things are done. Instead I focus on what is done. Output versus input. Simply said, I check if what goes IN, is coming OUT as expected.
I use it within clinical studies to check accurate database preparation as well as for testing programmed edit checks. I use it for quality control activities to check accurate clinical study data handling. And for test scripts, carried out for computerized system validation.
Almost all clinical data management activities can be checked with the IN = OUT, unless… principle. 

Best regards,

Maritza

 Black box testing for clinical data management  

4 core actions:
  1. Have your requirements thoroughly listed.
    What is your core business? Research & development, manufacturing, selling, contract research, patient care? If you need to carry out clinical trials or clinical studies, what are your requirements for these? Do you conduct clinical trials to obtain market approval for the product under subject? Is your product a drug, a medical device, a tissue-engineered product, or a combined product? Do you conduct clinical studies for post marketing surveillance? Sort out the applicable laws and guidances for your clinical trials and/or clinical studies (to be) conducted. Read and translate these regulations for your situation. Do you rely up on electronic records for data collection, data modification and/or data transfer? Then you’ll definitely need 21 CFR part 11 and its guidances. To have your requirements listed in thorough detail, external GCP courses and other regulatory courses are important to (have) join(ed). Discussing the practical implications of the law or guideline with the course facilitator, expert and other participants. In your own words, with the background of the organization you represent.
     
  2. Create a plan.
    Discuss how to investigate the fulfilment of each requirement listed. IN versus OUT testing works for most of these investigations. Big advantage is that it can be carried out and understood by your independent colleagues. Provide test data, the script to conduct and describe your expectations (expected results) per plan.
     
  3. Perform (IN versus OUT) testing.
    Just conduct the black box testing. And check if what went IN, is in the output as expected.
     
  4. Document, document, document along the way.
    Add action taken, date, name and signature on every plan, test script, test data set, test result and test report you’ve generate along the way. Take care that you document such that other people, e.g. colleagues, Auditors, can follow, understand and make their own judgement up on the results gained.

 

The challenge of clinical trial/study requirements is to clearly fulfil these.
In the center of each trial/study is the clinical data collected, stored, verified, updated and transferred. The more you rely up on your system, the more data handling activities can be automated and the more validation needs to be done.
The more you rely up on your procedures, the more specifications and documented evidence of correct performance you need to generate along the way. And the more you rely on your people, the more important quality control activities are to guarantee quality clinical data.

 

Good luck presenting your requirements and corresponding ‘black boxes’,

Kind regards,

Maritza

© 2011, Maritza Witteveen, ProCDM

This is an article from ProCDM. Helping enthusiastic Clinical Research Professionals with a drive to use their expertise, so they get heard, are appreciated and can make a difference. Receive tips and the free e-book ‘Five strategies to get reliable, quality clinical data’ by subscribing via http://www.procdm.nl/pages/knowledgebase.asp.
 

 share on Twitter

How to create room for creativity? – 2 steps towards innovation

How to break out of your day-to-day role, corresponding tasks and distractions? To work on the ideas that came to you? The ideas you’ve parked for the future? The things that could make a difference for you and your colleagues, maybe for people’s health(care)?

Well, not by:

  1. Working harder. Spending more time in the laboratory, in the office, at your desk. If you manage to work more, as a result, you will only get more of the same kind on your to do list. Working more is fine for a short period with a clear goal. With a week max! Any longer works like an energy-drain. Slowly leaking more and more energy, fun and possibilities out of your role.
  2. Hoping that the future will contain that time for you. Well, the future hasn’t, if you do not start yourself. If you do not change, the future does neither.
What does help is to pro-actively embed room for your creativity.

Two steps for innovation:

  1. Reserve time to sit down, without distraction to invest in your idea. Even though your regular tasks are not yet finished and urgent requests were asked, guard the time scheduled for your creative mind. If you long to make a difference, this time is equally important!
  2. Start to reserve one to 2 hours a week and just take that time. Even though you don’t know how to begin implementing your idea, take that time to start. You need to learn (again) how to put ideas in to practice. You’ll soon notice which steps are needed next.(Phone’s still and out of sight, door shut.)

  3. Create space for creativity in your head. David Allen’s Getting Things Done is a very good book to start creating space in your mind again.

Any idea what some creative space could give you?
(Re-)connection with your ‘creative’ mind. Using your skills to find best solutions. Researching and/or interested in other specialties and perspectives that could strengthen and/or benefit from the idea in practice.

Wishing you creative space to get your ideal solutions up & running,

kind regards,

Maritza

© 2011, Maritza Witteveen, ProCDM

You’re welcome to re-publish this newsletter, but please add the following text to it. This is an article from Maritza Witteveen. Helping enthusiastic Clinical Research Professionals with a drive to use their expertise, so they get heard, are appreciated and can make a difference. Receive tips and the free e-book ‘Five strategies to get reliable, quality clinical data’ by subscribing viahttp://www.procdm.nl/pages/knowledgebase.asp.

share on Twitter

How to step up for your clinical results and ideas – 2 strategic steps

 

What can count on your enthusiasm, your interest, within clinical research? The sophisticated technology, the ambitious people challenging themselves, the added value to patient care & health? Where do you walk that extra mile for? For what clinical results and ideas do you step up?
Once in a while I encounter these questions again. What drives me to write these articles, what attracts me in clinical research? Lately because I realized I’m not deeply within core clinical data management anymore. But I still do care for people with all kinds of different roles in clinical research. How all these various specialists together get medicines and devices approved for release. From the Principal Investigator and Research Nurse at the study site, the Monitor, Project Manager, Data Manager and Statistician to the Medical Writer of the Clinical Study Report. And all other (management) functions in between. Not forgetting the more staff like roles QA and IT people conduct.
And I do think you still experience challenges comparable to mine. Ever wanted extra space to grasp an indication, a diagnosis and its implications for people’s health? Ever longed to step up for a piece of software that could boost the lay-out and receipt of your reports? Ever wanted to acquire a SAS BASE license to use within your group? When I am enthusiastic of an idea or a capability, I easily walk extra miles to get this idea or chance heard and given feedback up on. This weeks article is therefore about how to step up for your clinical results and ideas. If you want to get heard too, this article is for you.

 

How to step up for your clinical results and ideas – 2 strategic steps

How to present your clinical study results and your clinical research ideas at meetings, during presentations, at tele- and video conferences etc. so that your message is received? Simply heard and given feedback up on?

Well, not by:

  1. The most fancy visuals. Although gadgets, easy effort and a sense of humour can help to brake any initial ice.
  2. Adjusting yourself to your audience by suddenly wearing a complete suit!, for example. Changing the look you normally spread professionally, doesn’t contribute to your story. On the contrary, it distracts and weakens your story. Even if your audience is completely new to you. So, if you normally can wear jeans and a simple jacket; take care but keep that look.
  3. Changing your moves. For example your normal way of talking. Trying to speak slow whereas you normally enthusiastically speak with heights and troughs. Or trying to move your hands less, whereas your hands naturally tend to help telling your story.

 

No, what really helps is to prepare your presentation strategically.

 

Two strategic presentation preparation steps:
 

  1. What exactly do you want to achieve with your presentation? Do you want higher salary scales for your department? In line with your gained additional tasks and / or responsibilities? Do you want to acquire a second, lighter EDC system for your post marketing studies? Do you want to acquire a SAS license? To create raw data listings with for your Clients? Do you want to lessen the effort spend to complete your trial’s CRFs? What do you want to gain? Where do you see an opportunity for your organization or the clinical trial results? How would that make life easier?
  2. In fact, the one big heart felt item that GOT you step up?

  3. What does your audience need to understand your message? Do they need facts and costs? Impressions? Organization impacts, FTE’s? What do they need in order to be able to decide up on your subject? Who is your audience? Is that the correct audience? Can they decide themselves or can they help you further? Should you change audience? Directly contacting these managers yourself? Or in the complete picture; resonates your idea with the organization’s core business?
  4. Imagine being part of your audience. Take in to account people’s roles within the audience you are presenting to.

 

Any idea what such a perspective would give back to you?
First of all compliments that you did value each others time. That you focussed on the items that matter. In the long run you will be remembered and asked to co-prepare or join future presentations on comparable subjects.

 

Any idea what such presentations would end in?
Feedback and support to get (part of) your idea implemented. Or a very reasonable reason to park it or skip it (for the moment). Very important, allowance to participate in the discussion of your idea. And on term, more opportunities to use your dedicated strengths.

You can check if I made a good presentation start…., if you hear me through the Significant presence program; 8 strategic steps to succeed in sharing your clinical results and ideas!”

Wishing you space to donate YOUR research contributions,

best regards,

Maritza

© 2011, Maritza Witteveen, ProCDM

You’re welcome to re-publish this newsletter, but please add the following text to it. This is an article from Maritza Witteveen. Helping enthusiastic Clinical Research Professionals to contribute to clinical results. You can receive more articles and the free e-book ‘Five strategies to get reliable, quality clinical data’ by subscribing to my ezine via http://www.procdm.nl/pages/knowledgebase.asp.

Why structuring soft skills benefits to clinical results

 

Last Friday I red an article about a new book of John Tierney en Roy Baumeister: Willpower. Rediscovering the Greatest Human Strength. The article struck me because it explained why my texts so often contain words like ‘structure’, ‘format’, ‘method’ and ‘program’.
Schedules and templates to work with give me room to contribute my time to the extra ordinary. E.g. to listen carefully to Clients’ needs, to find and improve solutions, to answer complex questions. In order words; to focus up on out of ranges, strange information, and phrasing.
But the article took the benefit of structures a step further by adding that structuring the ordinary saves energy. Energy, willpower you then can use to achieve your goals. Because with structures, you do not need to consume time and energy to the WHAT, WHEN, WHY, WHO and HOW of routine steps. Taking decisions, defining when it needs to be met. No, that’s already there. The decisions left are those that specifically benefit to the particular project under subject. Content decisions. Therefore this weeks article about structuring soft skills for clinical results.

 Why structuring soft skills benefits to clinical results 

How to write a quotation or estimate a budget for a clinical study project? How to discuss clinical study progress? How to.. etc. etc. Next to the direct data management work, there is also more indirect work to do that contributes to data management value tremendously! How to enjoy those things the most?
Well, comparable, if not exactly, to
 the data management actions you repeatedly carry out. Those steps you’ve written down and visualized in SOPs and User Manuals. In other words, standardizing the work you have to carry out, where possible.

For the actual data management work you’ve already,

  1. created SOPs,
  2. created User Manuals containing work instructions, forms for approval and templates to adjust,
  3. and validated system features or program code repeatedly used in your work.

 

For the more softer skills you can:

  1. Create templates. E.g. a quotation template. Not only a spreadsheet for cost estimation but a complete template containing the quotation text too. E.g. the complete quotation document and / or accompanying letter / e-mail. This way you quickly get a good draft quotation and you can spend your thoughts and time to adjust it to the particular person and organization you create the quotation for. What are their special needs? Where do I need to focus on in order to do synergize with this Client? What are the specific study requirements? And how can we best handle these?
  2. Setting-up template invitations and agenda’s for meeting types regularly conducted. Which provides time to, for example, do something extra for the most important agenda point. E.g. discussing this agenda point standing instead of sitting! Or putting in a complete other, full coloured background (or the opposite; black and white) when reaching the most important agenda item. Or asking another team member to start the item, by a max. 5 minutes (visual) presentation about that specific agenda point. Do extra ordinary ideas already come up?
  3. Create programs. E.g. for projects which need: (a) a clear start, (b) a pre-defined end, (c) to be finished within milestones and deadlines, and (d) clear deliverables as a result. Like the ProCDM SOP program; the package to complete every clinical data management SOP you need. Within a 6 weeks schedule.

 

Any idea what that would give you?
The energy to focus on and handling the unexpected. To hear, notice and use the ideas of colleagues, Clients and suppliers you work with. Carrying out the EXTRA that makes you proud on what you’ve accomplished.

The structure (e.g. template, agenda, method, program) gives you room to provide your contribution.

Any idea what that would look like?
Better work than you could imagine.

Being consistently prepared to do your job. So you can let go and listen, notice, capture and verify what your colleagues, suppliers or Clients want to express.

Wishing you a good time while discovering and improving your soft skills.

Kind regards, Maritza

Would you like to use energy saving structures? Get them from ProCDM. Contact for a solution.

© 2011, Maritza Witteveen, ProCDM
 

You’re welcome to re-publish this newsletter if you add the following text to it. This is an article from ProCDM. Data management for clinical research. Receive tips and the free e-book ‘Five strategies to get reliable, quality clinical data’ by subscribing via http://www.procdm.nl/pages/knowledgebase.asp.
 

share on Twitter

 

Practical SOPs – a quick format

How to get your SOPs as practical as possible without omitting the regulatory requirements and procedural helicopter view?After a decade of SOP creation for several companies, I managed to find a structure with which I can easily create SOPs within 6 weeks. Which works even better as a team effort. Main features, amongst others, are the primary colours and the SOP/User Manual combination.
 

Use the 4 primary colours to distinguish between SOP, work instructions, form and template.
1. Clear blue for  the SOP.
2. Green for the step by step work instructions
3. Red for the approval forms
4. and Yellow (eventually with a grey background) for any templates.

Secondly, create 2 documents for every procedure.
1. One for the WHY, WHAT, WHO, WHEN questions; the blue SOP.
 2. And the other containing the practical work-out; the HOW question, in your organization, with your system(s) and allocated tasks. The User Manual containing the green actions, steps to take in a certain order, the yellow templates and the red required forms for approval.

 

Any idea what that would result in?
SOPs that are well thought off; reflecting the team-effort. And providing the overview of solid choices made, needed input, produced results.

User Manuals with screen shots and incorporated tracking. With which (new) team members can easily conduct the biggest amount of the work. And through which they can focus on fulfilling the more complex study requirements and questions.
Created by a team-member providing the practical actions, the practical steps, in the required order. And tested, reviewed by a colleague.

Both documents are equally important. But as the User Manual reflects the practical steps, it is more often subject for change than the SOP. Thus a separate User Manual. 

Any idea what that would look like?
Example ProCDM SOP clinical study documentation
Example ProCDM User Manual clinical study documentation

Any help to get your team ready and enthusiastic to create or update their SOPs?
Contact ProCDM for the package to complete, every clinical data management SOP you need. Contact information ProCDM.

Kind regards, Maritza

 

© 2011, Maritza Witteveen, ProCDM

You’re welcome to re-publish this newsletter if you add the following text to it. This is an article from ProCDM. Data management for clinical research. Receive tips and the free e-book ‘Five strategies to get reliable, quality clinical data’ by subscribing via http://www.procdm.nl/pages/knowledgebase.asp.
 

share on Twitter

From CRFs to datasets – 5 examples

 

One of the three main tasks of data management is to translate individual subject data to logically grouped datasets ready for analysis. Study data captured in a structured format with which the statistician can work. But with what datasets can the statistician work?
In fact, with everything. Because he or she is capable of transforming your datasets to suiting datasets with the statistical software. So the question could better be, with what datasets can the statistician comfortably work? Without re-structuring the data delivered?

Well, first it is handy to know a bit more about the products statisticians deliver.

1. Tables with descriptive statistics describing the subject group under study. Overall descriptive stats for all subjects together or descriptive stats per treatment group or per gender.

N=208
Gender          Male 84 ( 40,4%)                 Female 124 (59,6%)
Age (yrs)        Mean = 56,7                         Min = 34   -    Max = 82
Weight (kg)   Mean = 78,8                         Min = 51   -    Max = 111

Tables for safety outcomes. Numbers and percentages of adverse events that occurred. Overall and per treatment group.

Adverse events                   Medication A      Medication B
                                                    (n=1205)               (n=1200)
                                         No. (%) of patients   No. (%) of patients
Gastrointestinal disorders  101 (8,4%)                            113 (9,4%)
  Diarrhea                              67 (5,6%)                               66 (5,5%)
  Nausea                               61 (5,1%)                               57 (4.8%)
Muscoloskeletal and connective
tissue disorders                   98 (8,1%)                               89 (7,4%)
  Pain in extremity                45 (3,7%)                               59 (4,9%)
  Back pain                            72 (6,0%)                               62 (5,2%)

2. Graphs to visually compare the different intervention groups under study. E.g. survival rates, pharmacokinetics.

3. Statistical tests to compare the efficacy objectives between the different intervention groups. On which the conclusion of your clinical study report will be based.

“Subjects receiving the new medicine were significantly
more likely to respond well up on overall quality of life, than were those who received the placebo(P < 0,05), whereas those walking within 24 hours after surgery, or weight loss were no more likely to respond well than those without these features.”

4. And last but not least, raw data listings if not already created by data management.
(The advantage of creating raw data listings for a study is that you get to know the individual study data. You are busy with all individual data records, instead of grouping them into a table, graph or analysis. It helps to get to know the individual drop-outs, the outliers and the missing measurements.)

Subject number  Visit date       Diastolic blood pressure  Heart rate
                                                           (mm Hg)            (bpm)
1209                        13AUG2011        127                            78
1210                        15AUG2011        116                              89
1301                        16JUN2011         104                             91
         

This about the products statisticians deliver for a clinical study report. Secondly some examples of datasets and why chosen as such:

1. A demography dataset, DEMO, is delivered with all demography data for all subjects, like gender, date of birth, but also subject number and date of screening. Only this demography dataset is needed to program a descriptive stats table for all subjects.

SUBJID         DSCREEN   GENDER      DBIR
1209              12JUN2011   1               17OCT1945
1210              13JUN2011   2               10FEB1961
1301               07JUL2011   1               04DEC1954

In- and exclusion criteria can be a separate dataset. Because these are only listed and checked for deviations.

2. Datasets contain subject numbers and most of them also have visit dates. These so-called key data fields, are used to combine data from different datasets. E.g. a dataset revealing the actual treatments merged with the demography dataset. Using the subject number, both datasets can be combined. And a descriptive stats table of the subjects per treatment group can be programmed.

SUBJID         GROUP         TRTLABEL
1209               A                     New medicine
1210               A                     New medicine
1301               B                     Placebo

With exception of the key data (subject number, visit number), CRF data should exist in one dataset only. Either in this or that, but not in two or more datasets.

3. Another example, blood – and urine laboratory assessments for all visits combined in one dataset. To check for laboratory result shifts across visits.

SUBJID   DVISIT             LABP             LABR   UNIT          OUT    CS
1210        13JUN2011   ASAT              68           U/L              2          2
1210        20JUN2011   ASAT              123        U/L             1          1
1210        08AUG2011   ASAT              72          U/L             2          2
1210        15AUG2011   ASAT               52          U/L             2          2
1210         13JUN2011   Creatinine     69   umol/L             2          2

All measurements collected in one visit are not necessarily present in one dataset. On the contrary, it is more logical to have different measurements in separate datasets. Maybe a measurements dataset for small repeating measurements.

4. Datasets that needed normalization, like often is more convenient for medical history, in- and exclusion criteria and laboratory datasets, can not be combined with non-normalized data in one dataset. Normalized datasets have additional key fields next to subject number and visit number. E.g Criteria number for an in- and exclusion criteria dataset. Or a specimen (blood/urine) field and a laboratory test field for a laboratory dataset.

SUBJID   DVISIT           CRITNO    CRIT                              INEX
1210        13JUN2011  4                   BMI < 25                     Yes
1210        13JUN2011  4                   BMI < 25                      Yes
1210        13JUN2011  5                   Is the subject pregnant?  No

Thus the single outcome of the one-time measured pregnancy test at screening is often added to the demography dataset instead of added to the in- and exclusion criteria dataset.

5. For identification and search reasons, adverse event and concomitant medication datasets contain adverse event numbers respectively concomitant medication numbers.

SUBJID  CONM No.    Medication                 Reason given   AE No.
1301         23                  Atenolol                       Prophylaxis
1301         24                  Prednisone                  Adverse event    3
1301         25                  Acetylsalicylic acid  Adverse event   12
         

Do you get an idea of how to structure your CRF data in logically grouped datasets?
In practice, get the blank CRF and sit down with the statistician or statistical programmer to logically group all CRF data in datasets. The total number of datasets for a regular clinical study…. is around 20 to 30 different datasets. Estimated time to draw CRF data to grouped datasets; 30 minutes. And you will discover with what structured format the statistician comfortable works.

Kind regards, Maritza

© 2011, Maritza Witteveen, ProCDM
 

You’re welcome to re-publish this newsletter if you add the following text to it. This is an article from Maritza Witteveen of ProCDM. Data management for clinical research. Receive tips and the free e-book ‘Five strategies to get reliable, quality clinical data’ by subscribing via http://www.procdm.nl/pages/knowledgebase.asp.
 

share on Twitter

How to write query texts – 6 template sentences

How to write queries unambiguously expressing what is asked for?
Using short, polite sentences?
Objectively explaining the underlying inconsistency?
 

First of all my general guidelines.

  1. My preference is to use no more capitals then needed. Capitals in the middle of a query text, e.g. for CRF fields or for tick box options, could distract from getting the actual question asked. E.g. compare the same query texts, with and without extra capitals.
    Please verify stop date. (Ensure that stop date is after or at start date and that stop date is not a future date.)
    Please verify Stop date. (Ensure that Stop date is after or at Start date AND that Stop date is not a future date.)
     
  2. Referring to CRF fields as they are shown on the CRF. To easily find the involved field(s).
     
  3. I prefer to leave any ‘the’ before a CRF field referral out of the query text. For more to-the-point query texts. E.g. compare the same query texts, with and without ‘the’ before data fields.
    Please verify stop date. (Ensure that stop date is after or at start date and that stop date is not a future date.)
    Please verify the stop date. (Ensure that the stop date is after or at the start date and that the stop date is not a future date.)
     
  4. Consistency in phrasing a query text can help to quickly write query texts or pre-program query texts in a structured, familiar way. That’s the thought behind the following 6 template sentences for query texts. Which you can use to help you write or program your queries.

 

The six ‘template’ sentences for query texts:

  1. Please provide…
  2. For asking the study site people to provide required data from patient care recordings. Examples:
    Please provide date of visit.
    Please provide date of blood specimen collection.
    Please provide platelet count.
    Please provide % plasma cells bone marrow aspirate.
    Please provide calcium result.

  3. Please complete…
    For asking the study site people to complete required data as required by the study CRF design. (Not necessarily required for patient care). Examples:
    Please complete centre number.
    Please complete subject number.
    Other frequency is specified, please complete frequency drop-down list accordingly.

     
  4. Please verify…
  5. For asking the study site people to check date and time fields fulfilling expected timelines. Or for asking the study site people to check field formats. Examples:
    Please verify start date. (Ensure that start date is before date of visit.)
    Please verify stop date. (Ensure that stop date is after or at start date and that stop date is not a future date.)
    Please verify date of blood specimen collection. (Ensure that date of blood specimen collection is before or equal to date of visit and after date of previous visit.)
    Please verify date last pregnancy test performed.
    Please verify date of informed consent. (Ensure date of informed consent is equal to date of screening or prior to date of screening.)
    Please verify date as DDMMYYY.

  6. …., please correct.
  7. For asking the study site people to correct a data recording inconsistent with another data recording. Example:
    Visit number should be greater than 2, please correct. 

  8. …., please tick…
  9. For asking the study site people to complete required tick boxes. Examples:
    Gender, please tick male or female.
    Pregnancy test result, please tick negative or positive.
    Any new adverse events or changes in adverse events since the previous visit, please tick yes or no.
    Laboratory assessment performed since the previous visit, please tick yes or no.
    LDH, please tick normal, abnormal or not done.

  10. Please specify…
  11. For asking the study site people to specify the previous data recording. Examples:
    Please specify other dose.
    Please specify other frequency.
    Please specify other method used.
    Please specify other indication for treatment. 

Finally, for query texts popping up during CRF data recording, it could be helpful to put location information in it. Like:
Page 12: Please verify start date. (Ensure that start date is after or at start date on page 11.)

Good luck finding your way to structure query texts,
kind regards, Maritza

© 2011, Maritza Witteveen, ProCDM
 

You’re welcome to re-publish this newsletter if you add the following text to it. This is an article from Maritza Witteveen of ProCDM. Data management for clinical research. Receive tips and the free e-book ‘Five strategies to get reliable, quality clinical data’ by subscribing via http://www.procdm.nl/pages/knowledgebase.asp.